Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
1.
Hypertens Res ; 46(3): 630-637, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239393

ABSTRACT

Vascular function assessment is useful for the evaluation of atherosclerosis severity, which may provide additional information for cardiovascular risk stratification. In addition, vascular function assessment is helpful for a better understanding of pathophysiological associations between vascular dysfunction and cardiometabolic disorders. In 2020 and 2021, although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was still a worldwide challenge for health care systems, many excellent articles regarding vascular function were published in Hypertension Research and other major cardiovascular and hypertension journals. In this review, we summarize new findings on vascular function and discuss the association between vascular function and COVID-19, the importance of lifestyle modifications for the maintenance of vascular function, and the usefulness of vascular function tests for cardiovascular risk assessment. We hope this review will be helpful for the management of cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Humans , Risk Factors , COVID-19/complications , Risk Assessment
2.
Angiology ; : 33197231183227, 2023 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233753

ABSTRACT

There are limited data on the arterial stiffness changes after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The present study evaluated the changes in arterial stiffness in completely healthy patients who had a SARS-CoV-2 infection using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). The study included 70 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 2020 and June 2021. A cardiac evaluation was carried out, including chest X-ray, electrocardiography (ECG), and echocardiography in all patients. Within the 1st month and 7th month CAVI was measured. Mean age was 37.8 ± 10.0 years, and 41/70 were female. Mean height was 168.6 ± 9.5 cm, mean weight 73.2 ± 15.1 kg, and mean body mass index (BMI) of the group was 25.6 ± 4.2, respectively. CAVI results from the right arm were 6.45 ± .95 at 1-month follow-up and 6.68 ± 1.05 at 7 months follow-up (P = .016) and from the left arm were 6.43 ± 1.0 at 1-month follow-up, 6.70 ± 1.05 at 7-month follow-up (P = .005). Our results showed an ongoing injury in the arterial system after healthy SARS-COV-2 patients during 7 months, as represented by CAVI measurements.

3.
Topics in Antiviral Medicine ; 31(2):283, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2320946

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 survivors can experience lingering symptoms known as PASC that appear in different phenotypes. The etiology remains elusive and endothelial dysfunction has been postulated as a main driver of PASC. Method(s): Prospective cohort including COVID- and COVID+ with (COVID+PASC+) or without (COVID+PASC-) PASC. We measured endothelial function using Endopat, an FDA approved test, with derived reactive hyperemic index RHI (endothelial dysfunction<=1.67) and arterial elasticity (augmentation index standardized at 75 bpm or AI@75;(lower =better). PASC symptoms were categorized into three non-exclusive phenotypes: Cardiopulmonary CP (postexertional malaise, shortness of breath, cough, palpitations), Neurocognitive N (change in smell/taste, neuropathy, 'brain fog', headache), and General G (fatigue, gastrointestinal or bladder problems). Result(s): We included 491 participants with 109 of the 186 with confirmed COVID+ experiencing PASC. Median number of days between COVID diagnosis and study visit was 249 days (IQR: 144, 510). Among COVID+PASC+, the median number of symptoms was 7.0 (IQR: 3.0,13.0);97 experienced symptoms categorized as G, 90 as N, and 87 as CP. COVID+ PASC+ had the lowest RHI (1.77+/-0.47) and the largest proportion [46.79% (n=51)] with RHI<=1.67 (Figure). AI@75 was the lowest in COVID- (3.11+/-15.97) followed by COVID+PASC- (3.57 +/- 16.34). Within COVID+PASC+, the mean AI@75 among G was 10.11+/-14.85, 11.36+/-14.67 with N, and highest (12.01 +/- 14.48) with CP. Symptoms' number was positively associated with AI@75 (p=0.01). The estimated mean difference in AI@75 between COVID+ PASC+ with CP and COVID+ PASC- was 8.44+/-2.46 (p=0.001), between COVID+ PASC+ with CP phenotype and COVID- was 8.9+/-1.91 (p< .0001), and between COVID+ PASC+ with CP phenotype and COVID+ PASC without CP phenotype was 7.51+/-3.75 (p=0.04) Conclusion(s): PASC was associated with worse arterial elasticity and within PASC, the cardiopulmonary phenotype had the highest arterial stiffness. (Figure Presented).

4.
Topics in Antiviral Medicine ; 31(2):284, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2314244

ABSTRACT

Background: Sex differences in immunological responses to COVID-19 infection and mechanisms that may contribute towards post-acute sequelae of SARS-Co-V2 (PASC) have been reported. However, evidence on the effects of COVID infection on vascular dysfunction and PASC are limited. Method(s): FDA approved EndoPAT device was used to measure endothelial function [Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI)] and arterial stiffness [Augmentation Index standardized at 75 beats/min (AI@75;higher AI = worse arterial elasticity)] in an adult cohort (age >=18 years) with a history of COVID-19 infection (COVID+) or confirmed SARS-CoV2 antibody negative (COVID-). Generalized linear regression was used to compute estimates of RHI and AI@75. Adjusted models included age, sex, race, blood pressure, lipids, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and pre-existing comorbidities. Two-way interactions were used to determine if the effects of COVID or PASC status on endothelial function depends on age, sex, race, smoking status, or prevalent comorbidities. Result(s): 61.99% (n=305) of study participants were COVID- and 187 (38.01%) were COVID+. Among COVID+, 57.22% (n=107) were female, 31.72% (n=59) were non-white race, and the average age was 46.64+/-13.79 years. COVIDparticipants had a smaller proportion (38.03%) of female sex (p< .0001), lower BMI [COVID+ (30.79+/-8.95 kg/m2) vs. COVID- (27.76+/-5.89 kg/m2);p< .0001], and higher proportion of smokers [COVID+ (17.78%) vs. COVID- (58.22%);p< .0001]. The average follow-up was 349.68+/-276.76 days and 109 (22.15%) COVID+ experienced PASC. 42.48% (n=80) of COVID+ and 41.64% (n=127) of COVID- had RHI<= 1.67 (p=0.8). The average AI@75 among COVID+ without PASC was 3.63+/-16.24, with PASC was 10.5+/-14.72, and 3.11+/-15.97 among COVID- (p=0.0001). Male sex had the lowest AI@75 (-0.08+/-14.9) compared to female sex (10.75+/-15.3;< .0001). In adjusted models, PASC, female sex had 8.14+/-2.95 higher AI@75 compared to PASC, male sex (p=0.006), 18.58+/-2.99 higher AI@75 compared to COVID+ without PASC, male sex (p< .0001), 13.81+/-2.11 higher AI@75 compared to COVID-, male sex (p< .0001), and 4.97+/-2.28 higher AI@75 compared to COVID-, female sex (p=0.03). Sex was not associated with RHI or modified the effect of COVID or PASC status on endothelial function Conclusion(s): The effect of COVID and PASC status on arterial stiffness depends on sex. Female sex is associated with increased arterial stiffness (worse arterial elasticity) in the post-acute phase of COVID-19. (Figure Presented).

5.
Trials ; 24(1): 328, 2023 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2318414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical manifestation of COVID-19 is associated with infection and inflammation of the lungs, but there is evidence to suggest that COVID-19 may also affect the structure and function of the cardiovascular system. At present, it is not fully understood to what extent COVID-19 impacts cardiovascular function in the short- and long-term following infection. The aim of the present study is twofold: (i) to define the effect of COVID-19 on cardiovascular function (i.e. arterial stiffness, cardiac systolic and diastolic function) in otherwise healthy individuals and (ii) to evaluate the effect of a home-based physical activity intervention on cardiovascular function in people with a history of COVID-19. METHODS: This prospective, single-centre, observational study will recruit 120 COVID-19-vaccinated adult participants aged between 50 and 85 years, i.e. 80 with a history of COVID-19 and 40 healthy controls without a history of COVID-19. All participants will undergo baseline assessments including 12-lead electrocardiography, heart rate variability, arterial stiffness, rest and stress echocardiography with speckle tracking imaging, spirometry, maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 7-day physical activity and sleep measures and quality of life questionnaires. Blood samples will be collected to assess the microRNA expression profiles, cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers, i.e. cardiac troponin T; N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; tumour necrosis factor alpha; interleukins 1, 6 and 10; C-reactive protein; D-dimer; and vascular endothelial growth factors. Following baseline assessments, COVID-19 participants will be randomised 1:1 into a 12-week home-based physical activity intervention aiming to increase their daily number of steps by 2000 from baseline. The primary outcome is change in left ventricular global longitudinal strain. Secondary outcomes are arterial stiffness, systolic and diastolic function of the heart, functional capacity, lung function, sleep measures, quality of life and well-being (depression, anxiety, stress and sleep efficiency). DISCUSSION: The study will provide insights into the cardiovascular implications of COVID-19 and their malleability with a home-based physical activity intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05492552. Registered on 7 April 2022.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular System , Middle Aged , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , SARS-CoV-2 , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Exercise , Lung , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic
6.
Hypertens Res ; 45(5): 846-855, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2311278

ABSTRACT

To fight the COVID-19 pandemic, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines were the first to be adopted by vaccination programs worldwide. We sought to investigate the short-term effect of mRNA vaccine administration on endothelial function and arterial stiffness. Thirty-two participants (mean age 37 ± 8 years, 20 men) who received the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were studied in three sessions in a sequence-randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded, crossover design. The primary outcome was endothelial function (assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD)), and the secondary outcomes were aortic stiffness (evaluated with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV)) and inflammation (measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in blood samples). The outcomes were assessed prior to and at 8 h and 24 h after the 1st dose of vaccine and at 8 h, 24 h, and 48 h after the 2nd dose. There was an increase in hsCRP that was apparent at 24 h after both the 1st dose (-0.60 [95% confidence intervals [CI]: -1.60 to -0.20], p = 0.013) and the 2nd dose (maximum median difference at 48 h -6.60 [95% CI: -9.80 to -3.40], p < 0.001) compared to placebo. The vaccine did not change PWV. FMD remained unchanged during the 1st dose but decreased significantly by 1.5% (95% CI: 0.1% to 2.9%, p = 0.037) at 24 h after the 2nd dose. FMD values returned to baseline at 48 h. Our study shows that the mRNA vaccine causes a prominent increase in inflammatory markers, especially after the 2nd dose, and a transient deterioration of endothelial function at 24 h that returns to baseline at 48 h. These results confirm the short-term cardiovascular safety of the vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vascular Stiffness , Adult , BNT162 Vaccine , Brachial Artery , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pulse Wave Analysis , RNA, Messenger , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
7.
Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering ; 84(7-B):No Pagination Specified, 2023.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-2305383

ABSTRACT

There has been a higher prevalence of developing anxiety due to frequent episodes of stress among adults in recent years. Chronic anxiety can contribute to the prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension. High anxiety and stress also contribute to overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system which can be quantified by increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Sympathetic overactivation can lead to vasoconstriction and loss of arterial elasticity. Anxiety, MSNA, blood pressure, and arterial stiffness are all interconnected, thus studying these relationships is crucial to understand the underlying mechanisms for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Non-pharmacological and mind-body treatments such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and stress management education (SME) have gained popularity in the management of anxiety and CVD risk. In Study 1, 19 volunteers (18-45 years) were randomized into 8-week MBSR or SME, where we monitored changes in anxiety, decentering, and arterial stiffness. There was a tendency for state anxiety to be reduced after MBSR (p=0.06), but carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) did not change from pre to post in either condition. Study 2 enrolled 27 volunteer participants (25+/-1 years) to determine how muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) reactivity influence post mental stress aortic augmentation index (AIx). The mental stress task significantly increased HR (DELTA15+/-2 beats/minute), MAP (DELTA14+/-1 mmHg), and perceived stress (DELTA1.9+/-0.1 a.u.), while MSNA (DELTA -13 to +20 bursts/min) was not significantly increased. The change in MAP during mental stress was a significant predictor (beta=0.47;p=0.03) of the change in AIx (post-stress vs. baseline). Changes in MSNA and perceived stress were not predictors of mental stress- xiv related changes in AIx. Study 3 examined how 8-week MBSR, or SME influenced anxiety and decentering in 36 volunteer participants. Nineteen participants completed the 8-week study prior to concerns over COVID-19 (no pandemic group = NPG), while 17 participants were affected by the stay-at-home order due to the pandemic (pandemic group = PG). Anxiety and decentering were measured before and after the 8-weeks of MBSR and SME. Trait anxiety was reduced in NPG/PG and MBSR/SME (p<0.05), while decentering was also improved in PG (p<0.03). The results of these studies agree with previous studies that indicate how MBSR can help to reduce anxiety. However, MBSR does not appear to decrease arterial stiffness (cfPWV). Aim 2 challenges the concept that acute stress-induced changes in aortic augmentation index are directly linked to changes in MSNA. The changes in AIx were linked to changes in MAP, but not MSNA. Aim 3 provides indications of how MBSR and SME can reduce trait anxiety and improve the ability to decenter during a global health crisis like COVID19. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

8.
European Respiratory Journal ; 60(Supplement 66):1953, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2299467

ABSTRACT

Background: SARS-CoV-2 determines a framework of multi-organ dysfunction that can involve the cardiovascular system creating damages of different nature. Among these, endothelial damage could play a key role in increasing arterial stiffness and thus the cardiovascular risk of infected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) of a population of patients after recovery from infection and to compare them with those of a group affected by arterial hypertension. Method(s): This prospective observational monocentric study involved 143 patients with previous diagnosis of Covid-19 who undergone PWV measurement during the follow-up at a median time of 3.8 months after the infection. These patients were compared to a population of 143 patients with hypertension matched by age, sex, Systolic Blood Pressure values and Body Mass Index. Result(s): PWV values were higher in Covid-19 group comparing to hypertension group (10.5+/-3.0 m/s VS 8.9+/-2.5 m/s). Furthermore, there is a correlation between higher PWV values and lower values of SpO2% at time of admission at the Emergency Department. (R=-0.302;p<0.001). Conclusion(s): SARS-CoV-2 infection seems related to increased PWV values. Moreover, higher arterial stiffness seems correlated to a worse oxygen saturation in Emergency Department. More studies with longer follow-up time are necessary to establish whether the vascular damage is reversible and whether it correlates with an increase of long-term cardiovascular risk.

9.
Pulse ; 9(Supplement 1):3-4, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2252814

ABSTRACT

Arterial stiffness is the best surrogate for vascular aging. We have put forward the notion of early vascular aging (EVA), in which subjects have arteries older than chronological age. On the opposite, subjects can be resilient to the effect of age and risk factors, and present arteries younger than chronological age, called supernormal vascular aging (SUPERNOVA). In the present lecture, I will discuss the definition and clinical utility of EVA and SUPERNOVA, how we can practically measure EVA and SUPERNOVA in clinics, and what measures can be applied to correct for EVA, and promote SUPERNOVA, especially in the context of COVID pandemic. I will also present the first results from the SPARTE interventional trial, and what the next steps should be.

10.
J Clin Med ; 12(6)2023 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2261108

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease, although arterial function involvement has been documented. We assess the impact of a post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation program on endothelium-dependent vasodilation and arterial wall properties. We enrolled 60 convalescent patients from COVID-19 and one-month post-acute disease, who were randomized at a 1:1 ratio in a 3-month cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program (study group) or not (control group). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was evaluated by flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and arterial wall properties were evaluated by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) at 1 month and at 4 months post-acute disease. FMD was significantly improved in both the study (6.2 ± 1.8% vs. 8.6 ± 2.4%, p < 0.001) and control groups (5.9 ± 2.2% vs. 6.6 ± 1.8%, p = 0.009), but the improvement was significantly higher in the study group (rehabilitation) (p < 0.001). PWV was improved in the study group (8.2 ± 1.3 m/s vs. 6.6 ± 1.0 m/s, p < 0.001) but not in the control group (8.9 ± 1.8 m/s vs. 8.8 ± 1.9 m/s, p = 0.74). Similarly, AIx was improved in the study group (25.9 ± 9.8% vs. 21.1 ± 9.3%, p < 0.001) but not in the control group (27.6 ± 9.2% vs. 26.2 ± 9.8 m/s, p = 0.15). Convalescent COVID-19 subjects of the study group (rehabilitation) with increased serum levels of circulating IL-6 had a greater reduction in FMD. Conclusively, a 3-month cardiopulmonary post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation program improves recovery of endothelium-dependent vasodilation and arteriosclerosis.

11.
J Clin Med ; 12(6)2023 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2276654

ABSTRACT

COVID-19-associated vascular disease complications are primarily associated with endothelial dysfunction; however, the consequences of disease on vascular structure and function, particularly in the long term (>7 weeks post-infection), remain unexplored. Individual pre- and post-infection changes in arterial stiffness as well as central and systemic hemodynamic parameters were measured in patients diagnosed with mild COVID-19. As part of in-laboratory observational studies, baseline measurements were taken up to two years before, whereas the post-infection measurements were made 2-3 months after the onset of COVID-19. We used the same measurement protocol throughout the study as well as linear and mixed-effects regression models to analyze the data. Patients (N = 32) were predominantly healthy and young (mean age ± SD: 36.6 ± 12.6). We found that various parameters of arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics-cfPWV, AIx@HR75, and cDBP as well as DBP and MAP-responded to a mild COVID-19 disease. The magnitude of these responses was dependent on the time since the onset of COVID-19 as well as age (pregression_models ≤ 0.013). In fact, mixed-effects models predicted a clinically significant progression of vascular impairment within the period of 2-3 months following infection (change in cfPWV by +1.4 m/s, +15% in AIx@HR75, approximately +8 mmHg in DBP, cDBP, and MAP). The results point toward the existence of a widespread and long-lasting pathological process in the vasculature following mild COVID-19 disease, with heterogeneous individual responses, some of which may be triggered by an autoimmune response to COVID-19.

12.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol ; 324(6): H713-H720, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273649

ABSTRACT

Many individuals who had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop detrimental persistent symptoms, a condition known as postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Despite the elevated risk of cardiovascular disease following COVID-19, limited studies have examined vascular function in PASC with equivocal results reported. Moreover, the role of PASC symptom burden on vascular health has not been examined. We tested the hypothesis that peripheral and cerebral vascular function would be blunted and central arterial stiffness would be elevated in patients with PASC compared with age-matched controls. Furthermore, we hypothesized that impairments in vascular health would be greater in those with higher PASC symptom burden. Resting blood pressure (BP; brachial and central), brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), forearm reactive hyperemia, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), and cerebral vasodilator function were measured in 12 females with PASC and 11 age-matched female controls without PASC. The severity of persistent symptoms in those with PASC was reported on a scale of 1-10 (higher score: greater severity). Brachial BP (e.g., systolic BP, 126 ± 19 vs.109 ± 8 mmHg; P = 0.010), central BP (P < 0.050), and PWV (7.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.0 ± 0.8 m/s; P = 0.015) were higher in PASC group compared with controls. However, FMD, reactive hyperemia, and cerebral vasodilator function were not different between groups (P > 0.050 for all). Total symptom burden was not correlated with any measure of cardiovascular health (P > 0.050 for all). Collectively, these findings indicate that BP and central arterial stiffness are elevated in females with PASC, whereas peripheral and cerebral vascular function appear to be unaffected, effects that appear independent of symptom burden.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate for the first time that resting blood pressure (BP) and central arterial stiffness are higher in females with PASC compared with controls. In contrast, peripheral and cerebral vascular functions appear unaffected. Moreover, there was no relationship between total PASC symptom burden and measures of BP, arterial stiffness, or vascular function. Collectively, these findings suggest that females with PASC could be at greater risk of developing hypertension, which appears independent of symptom burden.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hyperemia , Vascular Stiffness , Humans , Female , Pulse Wave Analysis , COVID-19/complications , Blood Pressure , Vasodilator Agents/pharmacology , Brachial Artery
13.
J Diabetes Complications ; 37(4): 108436, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251594

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx) are indices used to assess arterial stiffness. We aim to compare the effect of empagliflozin, liraglutide and their sequential combination on arterial stiffness indices in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: This was a randomized single blind study evaluating the effect of empagliflozin vs liraglutide in adult patients with T2D. Patients were randomized to liraglutide titrated gradually to 1.8 mg or empagliflozin 25 mg in 1:1 ratio. Three months later empagliflozin was added to the liraglutide group, and liraglutide was added to the empagliflozin group. Patients were assessed with non-invasive tests for arterial stiffness (i.e., carotid-femoral PWV and AIx of aortic pressure) at baseline, 3-month and 9-month visits (final visit was extended for 3 months from the initial design due to Covid 19 pandemic). The primary outcome was the between-group difference of PWV change (ΔPWV) and ΔAIx at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the between-group difference of ΔPWV and ΔAIx at 9 months, as well as the ΔPWV and ΔAIx between baseline and 9-month visit when total study population was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients with T2D (30 started liraglutide; 32 empagliflozin, mean age 63 years, 25 % with established cardiovascular disease) participated in the study. We failed to show any significant between-group differences of ΔPWV and ΔΑΙx at 3 and 9 months, as well as between-group difference of ΔPWV and ΔAIx for the total study population between baseline and 9-month visit. In contrast, systemic vascular resistance and lipoprotein(a) levels improved, showing better results with liraglutide than empagliflozin. Favorable effects were also observed on body weight, body mass index, body and visceral fat, blood pressure, HbA1c, and uric acid levels. CONCLUSION: No evidence of a favorable change in arterial stiffness indices was seen with empagliflozin or liraglutide or their combination in this study. Well-designed powerful studies are needed to address any potential effects on arterial stiffness in selected populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Vascular Stiffness , Humans , Middle Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , COVID-19/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Liraglutide/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Pulse Wave Analysis , Single-Blind Method , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/pharmacology
14.
Journal of Hypertension ; 41:e147, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2246368

ABSTRACT

Environmental noise significantly impacts human health and well-being. It is a widespread problem in Europe, where at least one in five people are exposed to harmful levels of noise. Hearing loss is the most known health effect related to noise exposure. There is, however, growing data that links noise exposure to hypertension, coronary artery disease, and stroke. According to some theories, this relationship may be explained by the indirect pathway of noise exposure, which can cause sympathetic and endocrine activation, as well as several cognitive and emotional responses, including annoyance. Noise exposure leads to stress reactions independent of cognitive involvement. There is a possibility that noise exerts its effects directly through synaptic interactions, as well as through cognitive and emotional effects. Epidemiological studies indicate that nocturnal noise exposure has more profound health consequences. Nighttime noise exposure is associated with an increase in heart rate due to sympathetic activation or parasympathetic withdrawal, and with an increase in blood pressure as well as endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension is a common condition and is an important risk indicator for other cardiovascular diseases. Previous studies showed an association between noise exposure, blood pressure and arterial hypertension. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies found an increase of hypertension prevalence per 10 dB increase in daytime average road traffic noise level. There is, however, some heterogeneity among these studies. Prospective studies have also found an association between aircraft noise exposure and hypertension, supporting the cross-sectional findings. The analyses, of data from the large Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports (HYENA) study, showed that an increase in nocturnal aircraft noise exposure per 10 dB was associated with an increased incidence of hypertension. The meaningful effect of night-time aircraft noise on arterial hypertension was also observed in the prospective observation of the subset of individuals from that study. In a longitudinal observation of 420 participants, higher aircraft noise exposure during the night significantly associated with the incidence of hypertension. Previous cross-sectional case-control study conducted in 2015, in 2 suburban areas of Krakow, Poland, revealed an increase in blood pressure and arterial stiffness as determined by carotid - femoral pulse wave velocity in individuals exposed to increased aircraft noise levels. However, even short-term noise reduction, as experienced during the COVID-19 lockdown, may reverse those unfavorable effects. As a result of these observations, noise mitigation strategies are important for cardiovascular health.

15.
Biomedicines ; 11(2)2023 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236433

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Abnormally increased arterial and aortic stiffness (AS and AoS), which are often associated with diastolic dysfunction (DD), represent common alterations in COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to assess, by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and pulse-wave velocity (PWV), the frequency of these dysfunctions in patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and to highlight potential correlations between their severity and multiple clinical and laboratory parameters. (2) Methods: In total, 121 women were included in our study, all of whom were younger than 55 and had been diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome. Of those women, 67 also had metabolic syndrome (MS) (group A), whereas the other 54 did not (group B); 40 age-matched healthy subjects were used as controls (group C). (3) Results: Patients in group A had worse values of indexes characterizing AS and AoS and had more frequent DD compared to those from group B and group C (p < 0.0001). The statistical analysis evidenced significant associations between these indexes and the time that had elapsed since COVID-19 diagnosis, the factors that characterize the severity of the acute disease and those that specify MS. Multivariate regression analysis identified the following as the main independent predictors for DD: values of the AoS index, the C-reactive protein, and the triglyceride-glucose index. (4) Conclusions: Altered AS, AoS, and DD are common in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome, especially with concurrent MS, and these parameters are apparently associated not only with the severity and time elapsed since COVID-19 diagnosis but also with MS.

16.
Hypertension ; 2022 Nov 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2229888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has become a dramatic health problem during this century. In addition to high mortality rate, COVID-19 survivors are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases 1-year after infection. Explanations for these manifestations are still unclear but can involve a constellation of biological alterations. We hypothesized that COVID-19 survivors compared with controls exhibit sympathetic overdrive, vascular dysfunction, cardiac morpho-functional changes, impaired exercise capacity, and increased oxidative stress. METHODS: Nineteen severe COVID-19 survivors and 19 well-matched controls completed the study. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography), brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and blood flow (Doppler-Ultrasound), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Complior), cardiac morpho-functional parameters (echocardiography), peak oxygen uptake (cardiopulmonary exercise testing), and oxidative stress were measured ~3 months after hospital discharge. Complementary experiments were conducted on human umbilical vein endothelial cells cultured with plasma samples from subjects. RESULTS: Muscle sympathetic nerve activity and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were greater and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, brachial artery blood flow, E/e' ratio, and peak oxygen uptake were lower in COVID-19 survivors than in controls. COVID-19 survivors had lower circulating antioxidant markers compared with controls, but there were no differences in plasma-treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells nitric oxide production and reactive oxygen species bioactivity. Diminished peak oxygen uptake was associated with sympathetic overdrive, vascular dysfunction, and reduced diastolic function in COVID-19 survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that COVID-19 survivors have sympathetic overactivation, vascular dysfunction, cardiac morpho-functional changes, and reduced exercise capacity. These findings indicate the need for further investigation to determine whether these manifestations are persistent longer-term and their impact on the cardiovascular health of COVID-19 survivors.

17.
Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal ; 34(1):a31, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2222814

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: In 2020, COVID-19 became a global pandemic affecting multiple aspects of everyday life.1-4 Since COVID-19 was a highly transmissible disease, in-person classes weremoved online,5,6 gyms were closed,1-3 and social interactions were limited.4 While some data exist on the impact COVID-19 has had on students,5,6 there is a need for further research to examine the compounding effects of the graduate level workload and the COVID-19 pandemic on physical therapy students. The purpose of this study is to understand how COVID-19 affects the cardiovascular (CV) and mental health of Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students as they progress through the program. We hypothesize that students would have better health outcomes in their second year, when the COVID-19 restrictions lessen, compared to their first year, when COVID restrictions were at their peak. NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: 16 students from the University of Texas at El Paso's DPT Class of 2023 were recruited via in-class presentation and email. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection occurred over the time period of a year and a half with a total of 3 visits (Oct 2020, June 2021, and April 2022). Primary outcome measures included cardiovascular fitness level via VO2max, arterial stiffness via Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV), and endothelial function via Venous Occlusion Plethysmography (VOP). Secondary outcome measures included Perceived Stress Survey (PSS), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Dietary Screening Questionnaire (DSQ). A repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) and Cohen's d for standardized effect size were utilized. Significance was set prior at an alpha level of 0.05. RESULT(S): VO2max increased from visit 1 to visit 2 (P5.02, d50.63) and then decreased fromvisit 2 to visit 3 (P< 01, d = 0.85), with no change between visits 1 and 3 (P>.05). Endothelial function increased from visit 1 to visit 3 (P< 01, d=0.89) and from visit 2 to visit 3 (P = .02, d = 0.65), with no differences between visits 1 and 2. Overall, there were no significant differences observed for PWV, PSS, METs, sitting time, sweetened beverages, and added sugar (P>05) between visits. CONCLUSION(S): The DPT Class of 2023 started their graduate education in the beginning of the COVID pandemic, with an already limited physical freedom. COVID restrictions were lessen in early 2021~4 months before visit 2. It appears that those 4 months were enough time to improve VO2max but not endothelial function. Interestingly, VO2max decreased back to baseline after the second year, with an increase in endothelial function. These changes could be attributed to an increase in time spent at school during the second year and increased travel time due to classes moving from virtual to in person, which could impact cardiopulmonary fitness but not endothelial function. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results from this study can help DPT programs throughout the nation understand the importance of developing strategies to support their students during times of crisis to reduce the risk of CV and mental health diseases in the future.

18.
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology ; 25(Supplement 1):S5, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2202558

ABSTRACT

Background and Aim: It is known that COVID-19 infection causes cardiovascular complications. It is thought that this may be related to endothelial dysfunction. The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between arterial stiffness, which may be an indicator of endothelial dysfunction, and disease severity. Method(s): Patients with COVID-19 infection and age, sex and cardiac risk factors matched control group were included in the study. Arterial stiffness was measured in the early period (within the first month) of COVID-19 infection. Echocardiographic measurements were also performed at the same time. The patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of covid, as mild and severe. In order to determine the severity of the disease, oxygen or intensive care need, biochemical parameters such as C-reactive protein (CRP), hs-troponin, complete blood count (CBC) were used in line with the recommendations. Arterial stiffness measurements were made by the gold standard applanation tonometry method, from the radial, carotid and femoral arteries. Result(s): A total of 84 patients were included in the study, 27 of which were in the control, 32 in the mild disease and 25 in the severe disease groups. The mean age of the population was 48.6+/-12.9 years, and 69% (n=58) were male. The whole group had 30% hypertension (HT), 10% Diabetes Mellitus (DM), 11% coronary artery disease (CAD), 11% were smoking and 2% with hyperlipidemia (HL). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of these risk factors. The mean pulse wave velocity (PWV) value obtained in arterial stiffness measurements was 8.02, 8.07 and 8.75 in the control group, mild disease group and severe disease group, respectively. These values were found to be statistically significant when the control group and mild disease groups were compared with the severe disease group. (p=0.007, p=0.008, respectively). Conclusion(s): The results of this study revealed that the deterioration in arterial stiffnes, which is a good indicator of endothelial dysfunction, is more significant in patients with severe COVID-19 infection. These patients should be followed more closely for subsequent cardiovascular complications.

19.
Atherosclerosis ; 355:49, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2176604

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims : SARS-CoV-2 determines a framework of multi-organ dysfunction that can involve the cardiovascular system creating damages of different nature. Among these, endothelial damage could play a key role in increasing arterial stiffness and thus the cardiovascular risk of infected patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) of a population of patients after recovery from infection and to compare them with those of a group affected by arterial hypertension. Method(s): This prospective observational monocentric study involved 143 patients with previous diagnosis of Covid-19 who undergone PWV measurement during the follow-up at a median time of 3.8 months after the infection. These patients were compared to a population of 143 patients with hypertension matched by age, sex, Systolic Blood Pressure values and Body Mass Index. Result(s): PWV values were higher in Covid-19 group comparing to hypertension group (10.5 +/- 3.0 m/s VS 8.9 +/- 2.5 m/s). Furthermore, there is a correlation between higher PWV values and lower values of SpO2% at time of admission at the Emergency Department. (R= -0.302;p<0.001). Conclusion(s): SARS-CoV-2 infection seems related to increased PWV values. Moreover, higher arterial stiffness seems correlated to a worse oxygen saturation in Emergency Department. More studies with longer follow-up time are necessary to establish whether the vascular damage is reversible and whether it correlates with an increase of long-term cardiovascular risk. Copyright © 2022

20.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(12)2022 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2163271

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with an increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) that persists even several months after the onset of infection. COVID-19 may also have an impact on arterial stiffness, which is a risk factor for CVD. We aimed to analyze if and to what extent arterial stiffness measured by photoplethysmography differed among COVID-19 convalescents depending on the acute phase severity and time elapsed since disease onset. A total of 225 patients (mean age 58.98 ± 8.57 years, 54.7% women) were analyzed after COVID-19 hospitalization at the Cardiac Rehabilitation Department of the Ustron Health Resort (Poland). In the entire study population, no differences were found in the mean values of stiffness index (SI) and reflection index (RI) depending on the severity of the acute COVID-19 and the time since the onset of the disease. There were no differences in the heart rate (HR) according to the severity of acute COVID-19; the mean HR was higher in patients who had COVID-19 less than 12 weeks before the study than in convalescents more than 24 weeks after the acute disease (p = 0.002). The mean values of SI and RI were higher in men than in women (p < 0.001), while the heart rate (HR) was similar in both sexes (p = 0.286). However, multiple linear regression analyses after adjusting for factors influencing arterial stiffness, i.e., sex, age, body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, the severity of the acute COVID-19, and the time from the disease onset, confirmed that age, sex, time from disease onset, and diabetes are the most important determinants that could influence arterial stiffness.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL